Subject Code & Title :- NRSG636 Foundations of Specialty Practice
Assignment Type :- Assessment
Words Count :- 2500 words +/- 10% Word doc or PDF (protected document format). Words over 2750 will not be marked.
NRSG636 Foundations of Specialty Practice 1 Assessment – Australia.
Interstitial Pulmonary Fibrosis Literature Review
Literature Review – Peer review journals only
Differentiate pathophysiology under pinning diagnosis treatment management in specialty practice
This assessment task provides students with the opportunity to locate organise analyse and synthesise evidence based literature in relation to the key pathophysiological concepts that under pin diagnosis treatment and management associated with a patient’s common health condition determinant and reflect on the Evaluation of evidence based literature related to concepts under pinning diagnosis treatment development and management of common health problems. More detailed information is available in Appendix C marking rubric.
Introduction :-
Introduce the reader to the common health problem determinant you will cover some Australian statistics epidemiology on the issue’s importance.
The introduction should indicate what your assessment will analyse and synthesise.
Literature review Analysis :-
Identify key ideas and understand the current thinking based on high quality evidence-based research literature related to the common health issue/determinant chosen
Analyse methodically and in detail to explain and interpret the following:
Differentiate anatomical physiological developmental and patho physiological concepts related to a common health problem in the specialty.
NRSG636 Foundations of Specialty Practice 1 Assessment – Australia.
Determine pathophysiological altered development/cellular changes related to diagnosis treatment management do not be tempted to focus on nursing care);
Reflect on the experience this illness has on the person family and/or community and how this is identified in the literature.
High-quality evidence-based literature includes: Clinical Practice Guidelines Meta-analysis/synthesis Systematic reviews
Conclusion :-
Do not add new material.
Summarise the main features of the common health issue/determinant.
Demonstrate to the reader you have understood what you have written.
ORDER This NRSG636 Foundations of Specialty Practice 1 Assessment NOW And Get Instant Discount
